FOI reveals new information about CSA role

SC_FOI

The role of the Chief Scientific Adviser has no mention of science policy and is potentially under-resourced as revealed by Freedom of Information documents accessed by ScienceCalling.

The director general of the government’s science funding agency, Science Foundation Ireland, was appointed the role of CSA late last year. According to a letter to Minister Richard Bruton accessed under Freedom of Information (FOI), SFI was operating at 5 posts below its approved ECF number of 52.5 last October.

Prof Mark Ferguson did not receive additional pay or resources when taking on the duties of the CSA. Though supporting the role, the letter cited a number of additional responsibilities that are to be absorbed in the coming months by the SFI staff.

Chairperson of SFI, Prof Patrick Fottrell writes that “the Board expressed the strong view that the Foundation must be facilitated in operating at its full, approved ECF staff complement.”

FOI documents also reveal that policy is not mentioned in the duties of the CSA. Some of these duties are mentioned on the CSA’s new website. In an interview with ScienceCalling, Minister Seán Sherlock said the CSA has nothing to do with Government policy but the Government “can seek advice from the Chief Scientific Adviser, as needs be, on any issue.”

All mention of science policy was removed from the website of the Chief Scientific Adviser in an update this morning. The following sentence was taken down:

The Office of the Chief Scientific Adviser was established in 2004 to provide the Government with independent, expert advice on issues related to public science policy

Since this was on main text on the homepage of the website, it is understandable that most people’s interpretation is that the CSA’s job is intrinsically related to science policy.

Related posts:

Image: by moi with FOI symbol from foi.gov.ie

7 thoughts on “FOI reveals new information about CSA role

  1. What the heck is happening with Minister Sherlock. I heard the interview with him and now with no consultation the office of the CSA has changed again? He is making it up as he goes along. We don’t have a proper office of the Chief Scientific Officer, fact!

  2. they are just making it up as they go along. of course the adviser never MADE policy, he advised independently so politicians would develop better policy. sheesh

  3. The fact that this makes no sense is that Sherlock is not making sense. Why weren’t journalists told this at the time when Cunningham was retiring? SMOKESCREEN

Comments are closed.